Is this story correct? Usually these things involve Bacardi :P

Usually when I find a story about a stupid criminal doing something stupid for/while-drunk-on rum, it invariably involves Bacardi. But this time it seems Captain Morgan (and Captain Morgan Private Stock) served as this master criminal’s boozy muse:

Deputies: Rum thief left barrel of clues after bar burglary

So, do we respect him more or less? Private Stock isn’t exactly top shelf, but depending on the bar it might have been the best available. Perhaps we have a connoisseur on our hands?

Comments (2)

  1. Mad Jack

    really, he just needed something to walk home with, and Captain was all that was around…

  2. Beneron Little

    Any port in a storm, I suppose.

Comments are closed.